Competitive Analysis of EXCOR and Anticortit Films
Evaluation of Griffolyn Corrosion Intercept
Methods: Razor Blade Test
SO2 Test
ASTM D 1748 (Humidity chamber)
Materials: Razor Blade Test Kit
SO2 Test Kit
Razor Blade on Carbon Steel |
Razor Blade on Copper |
|||||
Material |
Panel #1 |
Panel #2 |
Panel #3 |
Panel #1 |
Panel #2 |
Panel #3 |
Corrosion Intercept |
Fail |
Fail |
Fail |
Fail |
Fail |
Fail |
VCI-126* |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Control |
Fail |
- |
- |
Fail |
- |
- |
*Typical results for VCI-126.
Note: The following physical changes were noticed on the contact side of the Intercept material after the test was finished: Discoloration and separation of layers (see photo).
SO2 Test |
Final Results |
|||
Material |
Panel #1 |
Panel #2 |
Panel #3 |
Pass/Fail |
Corrosion Intercept |
Grade 2 |
Grade 0 |
Grade 2 |
Fail |
VCI-126* |
Grade 4 |
Grade 4 |
Grade 4 |
Pass |
Control |
Fail |
- |
- |
- |
*Typical results for VCI-126 Film.
Grades 3 and 4 are passing
- Grade 0 - Extensive corrosion covering 25% or more of panel surface
- Grade 1 - Moderate corrosion covering 10-25% of panel surface
- Grade 2 - Slight corrosion 5-10% of panel surface
- Grade 3 - Very slight corrosion 0-5% of panel surface
- Grade 4 - No visible corrosion on panel surface
ASTM D 1748 (Humidity Chamber)
Material |
Panel # |
Amount of Corrosion after 168 Hr. |
Corrosion Intercept |
1 |
15% |
2 |
15% |
|
Control |
15% |
Conclusions: According to the test results above:
- The Intercept material does not provide corrosion protection in a sulfur dioxide environment.
- The film’s ability to provide corrosion protection is affected by climatic conditions (see ASTM D 1748 Humidity Test).
Estimated Cost of Project: $112.50
Project #: 00-169-1125
To: Boris Miksic
For: Cortec Corporation
From: Debbie Hannan
Date: August 16, 2000
cc: Anna Vignetti
Art Ahlbrecht
Tom Nelson